NAACP Breaks 116-Year Tradition by Not Inviting President Trump to National Convention

Credit: NAACP

By Shaun B | June 7, 2025

CHARLOTTE — In a historic departure from its long-standing tradition, the NAACP has announced that President Donald Trump will not be invited to its upcoming national convention in Charlotte. This marks the first time in 116 years that a sitting U.S. president has been excluded from the organization's annual gathering.

A Decision Based on Actions, Not Politics

NAACP President Derrick Johnson emphasized that the decision was not motivated by partisan politics, but rather by the organization's core mission and values. Johnson stated that President Trump’s actions as Commander-in-Chief directly conflict with the civil rights organization’s purpose and principles.

“The NAACP has always been nonpartisan, but never neutral when it comes to injustice,” Johnson said. “This decision reflects our ongoing commitment to hold leadership accountable when their policies and rhetoric undermine the rights and dignity of the communities we serve.”

Legal Tensions With the Administration

The NAACP’s strained relationship with the Trump administration has been well-documented. The organization has filed multiple lawsuits challenging various policies implemented under Trump’s leadership, including:

• Voting rights restrictions

• Immigration policies

• Rhetoric viewed as inflammatory or discriminatory

These legal battles have only deepened the divide between the White House and the nation’s oldest civil rights organization.

Breaking a Century-Old Precedent

For over a century, sitting U.S. presidents have been invited to address the NAACP convention, regardless of political affiliation. The absence of President Trump this year marks a significant shift, underscoring the depth of the current conflict between the organization and the administration.

Civil rights historians note that this move sends a clear message: symbolic gestures of unity cannot substitute for substantive policies that protect civil rights and promote equality.

A Historic Moment With Broader Implications

The NAACP’s decision has sparked national conversation about the role of civil rights organizations in modern politics, the accountability of elected officials, and the tension between tradition and principle.

Observers are watching to see how this decision may influence future administrations' relationships with advocacy groups, especially as issues of race, justice, and civil rights remain at the forefront of American political discourse.

Conclusion

By breaking with 116 years of precedent, the NAACP is taking a stand it believes reflects its mission and responsibility to the communities it represents. As the convention approaches, the absence of the sitting president will undoubtedly remain a major point of discussion — both within the organization and across the nation.

👉 For full coverage, watch the related segment here: Watch the Full Interview